« BACK

3 Problems with Existing Image Management Solutions in Hospitals

cloud_blog_imageHere’s a sneek peek from our latest eBook on unified image management in the enterprise. Download here to view the entire guide!

Cost
The purchase of a traditional PACS system includes hardware and software licensing (typically a 5+ year long commitment), extensive IT staff to maintain and update the system, electricity costs for power and cooling, purchasing and updating user licenses, and wasted hours of solving IT dilemmas onsite.

Accessibility
In a fast-paced medical environment, like that of a trauma unit, CDs have become a matter of life or death. Frequently, patients arriving from a trauma center or as a referral have medical imaging on a CD. If the CD was not lost or damaged in transport, it might be incompatible with the system upon arrival–leading to a tedious upload process. This method is not only highly frustrating for medical staff, but also places patients at high risk for redundant radiology exams exposing them to additional radiation.

In an increasingly digital world, doctors are beginning to require information at their fingertips when and where they need it. With traditional viewing infrastructures, when a patient comes in as an emergency, doctors are unable to make a preliminary assessment from their homes. The key now is allowing doctors to view images as they are received in real-time, from any location and on any device.

Interoperability
Exchanging medical images is complex due to the extremely large size of image files and the many systems that must be interconnected to seamlessly access and care for all of a patient’s record – regardless of the file type. As a result, digital transfer of imaging and reports can be a daunting and slow process. While most PACS have perfected managing DICOMs within their facilities’ walls, it’s often necessary for this information to be shared with sources outside of a network, and also with EMR & RIS. Digital sharing of large medical image files using VPNs can slow down a network and require an extremely large download window. This type of connection is limiting, as direct point-to-point connections must be set-up before image sharing can occur. Further, complicating matters is that using a hub-and-spoke model prevents two spoke hospitals from exchanging data without first passing through the hub hospital.

«
»
Catherine Slotnick, Marketing Manager

About Catherine Slotnick

Catherine Slotnick is a passionate healthcare marketer with a deep interest in the latest & greatest in the Health IT space. As Ambra Health's marketing manager, Catherine primarily focuses on creating and sharing thought leadership content in the radiology and informatics space. Catherine graduated from the University of Virginia with a BA in Psychology & Art History. When she's not writing, she enjoys cooking and petting dogs that aren't hers.

Medical Imaging Software Buyer's Guide

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *